Brutal Honesty
About Me
- Name: Clayton Leon Winton
- Location: Spokane, Washington, United States
I live in the middle of the Kaniksu National Forest on the Priest River with my four wonderful pets, where we are attempting to build a cabin. Contact: Clayton Winton 1818 E 16th, Spokane, WA 99203 Clayton.Winton@Yahoo.Com
Saturday, January 31, 2015
Sat Shevat 11, 5775 22:35PDT
Defending DataCorp
Dick Cheney introduced the Paperwork Reduction Act to eliminate redundant paperwork schemes. We need a Data Reduction Act to accomplish the same goals.
Furthermore, what we have today, attacking governments throughout the world from the inside-out, is a Predatory Credentialing System. That is a piece of legislation that funds credential-sales at taxpayer-expense. What that is, is "job-security" for future-generations of college-grads, professionally unionizing, 'donating-back' to a particular political-entity (party) for more benefits, perks and raises, annually, at taxpayer-expense, profiting from atop rubble, confusion, misery and grief.
For example, our Healthcare and Justice systems: To colleges, tech-schools or universities selling credentials, "success" to them is "all beds full," and, hopefully, there will be more and more beds to fill. To everybody else in the world, "success" in terms of both healthcare and criminal-justice, is "all beds empty," because everybody is healed, peaceful and healthy.
As for toxic cleanup, it too has become a giant bureaucracy, professionally-unionized, profiting from more and more types of "spills" and "messes." If there were truly fewer "spills," and/or all 'messes' were cleaned-up, they would be out of jobs. Universities secure credential sales by growing government bureaucracies at taxpayer expense.
With that in mind, we must be forward-thinking when it comes to privacy and data security. These are the "cream" of college, tech-school and university credential sales. The data-systems built and designed and administered are all graduates of these credentialing programs. What we have experienced for real, for everybody else, is greater VULNERABILITY for the individual citizen and growing LIABILITY for private industry and governments, worldwide.
Cyber-vandalism, data theft, identity theft, credit card fraud, transfer of child pornography, sell of weapons, chemicals, bio agents and human trafficking is "job-security" in terms of credential-sales to colleges, tech-schools and universities, to lure future-generations of college-grads into their credentialing programs, and upon graduating a "promise" their investment in a credential will be rewarded with a "good paying job." But that is always the same: job-security for those college grads, who professionally unionize, pool their 'donations' to a particular political-entity (party) of the Legislative Branch, always demanding more, more, more perks, benefits and annual raises. As a result, VULNERABILITY increases with LIABILITY, and government can't keep up.
We need a DataCorp. It should be administered by GayLandIs. There will be no chance of blackmail or theft. And for the years-of-service volunteered, the local will be in isolation, where the vounteers live and work. There will be zero connectivity. It will be a true archive. GayLandIs is the only demographic, worldwide, capable of the unique pressures, and detachment from personal-relations, as there will be no families of children, no 'personal entanglements.'
The importance of that would take volumes to describe and would not cover the half of it. Only the highest levels of discipline would be tolerated. It needs not be yet another PhD-predator credential-salesjob. On the contrary it's about defending all people and government(s) against exactly that.
Consider this: I just watched a 'prophetic' episode of Star Trek original. It was a trial of an Officer. The 'witness' against the Officer was not a human, but a machine. A computer. The data indicated the human Officer was liable.
BODY CAMERAS and POLICEMAN are the topic, today. The same situation WILL ARISE. The Spokane Police Department, for example, under Frank Straub, is now migrating to BodyCams for all Officers. Where and Who and How the data will be stored, and who and how the copies are differentiated from the originals in ARCHIVE is still an UNKNOWN, as it is throughout the United States, every city, every police force, every state, every country, Federal Law Enfrocement inclusive, and the Department of Defense, too.
We need this. Yesterday.
Kind Regards, always,
CLAYTON LEON WINTON citizen#C03183395
1818 E. 16th Ave., Spokane, WA, 99203
Monday, January 26, 2015
Defending Liberty
Mon Shevat 6, 5775 11:51PDT
Defending Free-Expression
It was me, not you, me, that helped the stranger, and before helping the stranger I did not put conditions on it, that would be you, it was I that helped the stranger, for if I'd put conditions on it, had said, "who do you pray to," he'd have said, "fuck you."
CHORUS:
-- fuck you Mohammad
-- fuck you Krishna
-- fuck you Jesus
-- fuck you Buddha
It was me that served meals to the starving;
It was me that gave blankets to the homeless;
It was I that helped the child;
It was I that helped the stranger, the different, the out-cast, the needy, unconditionally, while your followers just teach each other to hate each other, any word will do, so fuck you, cuz if I had, before helping the stranger, said, "who do you pray to," he'd have said, "fuck you."
Shalom and Amen.
CLAYTON LEON WINTON citizen#C031833995
Defending Free-Expression
It was me, not you, me, that helped the stranger, and before helping the stranger I did not put conditions on it, that would be you, it was I that helped the stranger, for if I'd put conditions on it, had said, "who do you pray to," he'd have said, "fuck you."
CHORUS:
-- fuck you Mohammad
-- fuck you Krishna
-- fuck you Jesus
-- fuck you Buddha
It was me that served meals to the starving;
It was me that gave blankets to the homeless;
It was I that helped the child;
It was I that helped the stranger, the different, the out-cast, the needy, unconditionally, while your followers just teach each other to hate each other, any word will do, so fuck you, cuz if I had, before helping the stranger, said, "who do you pray to," he'd have said, "fuck you."
Shalom and Amen.
CLAYTON LEON WINTON citizen#C031833995
Sunday, January 25, 2015
Defending Banks re: Tsipras
MY WORDS after the Syriza win, from comments I wrote on the BBC Europe website:
No, I'm not in Greece, but this will have world fallout. This is another politician taking 'donations' to say anything that "sounds-reasonable.' The only way for his pie-in-the-sky plans to work, is to not return what Greeks borrowed, which is organized theft, outright fraud. I don't care if he calls it "re-write" or "write-off," it's fraud, the "new, improved, cleaner, better, brighter, whiter, more-efficient, less-expensive," version. But theft is theft. Is that the "new Greek legacy?"
So, what alternatives are there? Asset seizures. Whose? The people. What's it gonna be, Mr. Tsipras? Whose assets will you forfeit? Will it be banks? Will it be corporations? Will it be pension funds, trust funds, retirement funds, what exactly? Or, will you organize an army and go pillage and plunder? You led the people here ...
... waiting.
Kind regards, always,
CLAYTON LEON WINTON
Spokane, WA, USA
No, I'm not in Greece, but this will have world fallout. This is another politician taking 'donations' to say anything that "sounds-reasonable.' The only way for his pie-in-the-sky plans to work, is to not return what Greeks borrowed, which is organized theft, outright fraud. I don't care if he calls it "re-write" or "write-off," it's fraud, the "new, improved, cleaner, better, brighter, whiter, more-efficient, less-expensive," version. But theft is theft. Is that the "new Greek legacy?"
So, what alternatives are there? Asset seizures. Whose? The people. What's it gonna be, Mr. Tsipras? Whose assets will you forfeit? Will it be banks? Will it be corporations? Will it be pension funds, trust funds, retirement funds, what exactly? Or, will you organize an army and go pillage and plunder? You led the people here ...
... waiting.
Kind regards, always,
CLAYTON LEON WINTON
Spokane, WA, USA
Defending Google -- WHY SHOULD GOOGLE CARE?
Sun Shevat 5, 5775 10:44PDT
WHY SHOULD GOOGLE CARE?
The internet company called, "Google," was started by a couple of kids, young guys, "20-somethings." Their goal was to make money to buy 'stuff.' Developing a mission statement that markets a service and an ideal was the challenge, as it is for all companies, and, proving it. Is it just about making money to buy 'stuff,' or, to provide a service that is helpful to others at a reasonable cost, with a reasonable profit to live, well, reasonably?
Over the years, Google expanded, hiring thousands. Every "new idea" became a "division" to add another product. Was the new product or service to provide a better value for the customer, or to maximize their own 'phaaat-bottom' lines?
Most customers of Google are not the millions of end-users that use Google products, so writing about it makes it seem confusing. A customer of Google is someone that buys or "rents" a "platform" from which to "pitch" their own products or services to end-users and other businesses. The end-user is the guy sitting at home, that types "http://www.google.com" into their internet browser, and then searches for something, a book, a word, an article about history or definition of pending legislation, etc.
And there are many ways to make-use of Google Products, free for end-users. Whle using calculators or spreadsheets or YouTube video-sharing or photo-album sharing or address books and so much more, the end-user allows other companies to "pitch" their products on-screen. These may not be "plain 'ole" advertisements. These are tiny "snippets" of something to "grab your attention," even for a moment, just-in-case it could be 'helpful' to you while doing whatever it is you are doing. Pop-up ads are annoying and "block your path," therefore are disruptive, burdening end-users with "additional steps" and "functions" that have nothing to do with one's tasks, hindering your on-line experience. Google strives to do better.
Blogger is a Google Product. Anybody can freely-express themselves in an online blog, which is a 'journal' to write one's thoughts, to freely-express one's opinions or beliefs. These blogs are "searchable" from the Google Product "search," so other people can find 'articles' about things of interest. Are you into gardening? Well, there are thousands who are. Need "insight" into auto-mechanics? Somebody had the same problem you have, and wrote a blog about it. See how that works?
It's a valuable service. And it's free, to anybody that wishes to make use of it. It's paid for by Google's customers. It's free to everybody, but Google's customers pay for it, by "renting" a space to "grab your attention" while using the free online service, in a non-disruptive way. If you search for blog entries about gardening, a Google Customer bought space and time to also show you that they have a magazine about gardening you can subscribe to, or a handy-dandy gadget about gardening you may find useful at home, in your own garden, for example.
That's why the service is valuable. That's why Google expanded into a broad range of Products, but it is the Google customer that pays for the convenience. It's all free to end-users.
So, what if an end-user has a complaint? They aren't paying for anything. They aren't "out" anything, monetarily, if something free isn't "working properly" or didn't do what they thought it would do. Should Google care?
If you were given a free pair of shoes, and they didn't fit, who are you going to complain to? What exactly is the complaint? Should Google care? WHY SHOULD GOOGLE CARE?
I started a blog years ago. Before starting my blog, I used pencil and paper, writing in a journal, spiral-bound note-books, etc. I started doing this as a kid. Before there was an internet, I was doing this on old BBS/EBBS systems, saving-to-disk. It's about my own faith, see. It doesn't matter the topic or the words used, it's about doing it, exercising free-expression. In so doing, per my faith, one's "heart" is "clarified" by "sorting through" the many thoughts of every-day existence. It's an ancient proverb, it comes from the Torah, and is applicable to all people, equally.
The blog I started online was on a website called, "Blogger." At the time, it was not owned by Google, so it was not a Google Product. I could, however, use Google Search to find my blog, or words or phrases in my blog that I had written about. That was very helpful. Did I use the word "Nephelium?" I could find it in my many blog posts on Blogger, using Google Search.
Google bought Blogger, and moved my blogs from "blogger dot com" to "blogspot dot com." Ever since, I cannot search for anything in my blogs. Further, the title of one of my blogs on Blogger was "BrutalHonesty," and it was unique, and I could type the name into my web browser's address bar and see my blog. Ever since Google bought Blogger, that is not the case, it takes me someone else's blog, called, "RandomThoughts," which has nothing to do with me, or my topics, or my faith.
Further, when I type in the web address of my blog, it re-directs me to "brutalhonesty2" instead of "BrutalHonesty dot blogger (now blogspot) dot com." In other words, my freely-expressed words, as per my faith, are hidden-away, somewheres, and unsearchable, in an electronic "dark-cave."
Is it because of my faith? Is it because of my sexual-orientation? Is it because of my Disabled American status?
WHY SHOULD GOOGLE CARE?
And this is where the 'arguments' go haywire and endless complicated "business models," memorized soundbites, reasonable-sounding platitudes, and text-book back-office jargon becomes a mindless droning-sound.
I can imagine the "sales-pitch" to a customer of Googles, buying space and time, to promote their own products and services to the many free-users of Google's. The Google marketing-rep may make a commission, and I can imagine he or she saying something like this: "We have algorithms that determine, over time, which end-users actually buy products that are shown on their computer screens while using Google, to single-out the low-income, disabled, or, to be 'pc' , "non-buyer" , and by doing so, you won't have to waste your ad dollar on those that won't buy anything anyway."
I can imagine that, and a whole lot more. PROVE ME WRONG, PLEASE!
Shalom and Amen.
Kind regards, always,
CLAYTON LEON WINTON
1818 E. 16th Ave., Spokane, WA 99203
---------------------------------------------------
Tue Shevat 7, 5775 22:27PDT
On International Holocaust Remembrance Day, Google displayed a memorial to remember the Holocaust. I clicked the link, the display was too wide for my browser, and I could not view it. I pushed my browser to the left side of the screen, then elongated it to make-it two-times the width of the screen -- yet, the images still would not display, and the text was cut-off on the far right-side of the page. I did it again, making the browser window three-times the width of the screen, and it still didn't display the text. I made the browser window five-times the width of the screen, and finally the text displayed, but the "next-page' and all the pictures were distorted, stretched-out. It was completely undisplayable.
I sent "feedback" to google and attached a screenshot 'snapshot' after returning my browser to somewhere near "normal size," but after adjusting the window, the text was now scrunched on the left-side of the screen, the first letters/words unreadable of each line of text, whereas previously, all the last words of each line were unviewable. Regardless, the Holocaust Remembrance of the Liberation of Auschwitz was unviewable, distorted.
I what type of "technical glitch," I have no idea. Kind of liike my blogs on Google Blogger and the modification of their display, search results, and total lack of anyone viewing a single page of it or commenting in all these years, after it was moved (against my wishes) from "blogger dot com" to "blogdot dot com" and my blog title "BrutalHonesty" changed to "brutalhonesty2" (emphasis on the numeric "2") against my wishes or notification.
I don't know if it's "Brown Shirts" types in their organization or not, but there's alot of 3rd-party contracting out of Google, and alot of those Brown-shirt types around here, so it wouldn't surprise me in the least. WHY SHOULD GOOGLE CARE? Maybe they don't ...
-----------------------------------------------------
Sun Shevat 19, 5775 18:41PDT
Comments I wrote on my Facebook page: GOOGLE, PLEASE PAY ATTENTION:
---------------------------------------------------
Tue Shevat 7, 5775 22:27PDT
On International Holocaust Remembrance Day, Google displayed a memorial to remember the Holocaust. I clicked the link, the display was too wide for my browser, and I could not view it. I pushed my browser to the left side of the screen, then elongated it to make-it two-times the width of the screen -- yet, the images still would not display, and the text was cut-off on the far right-side of the page. I did it again, making the browser window three-times the width of the screen, and it still didn't display the text. I made the browser window five-times the width of the screen, and finally the text displayed, but the "next-page' and all the pictures were distorted, stretched-out. It was completely undisplayable.
I sent "feedback" to google and attached a screenshot 'snapshot' after returning my browser to somewhere near "normal size," but after adjusting the window, the text was now scrunched on the left-side of the screen, the first letters/words unreadable of each line of text, whereas previously, all the last words of each line were unviewable. Regardless, the Holocaust Remembrance of the Liberation of Auschwitz was unviewable, distorted.
I what type of "technical glitch," I have no idea. Kind of liike my blogs on Google Blogger and the modification of their display, search results, and total lack of anyone viewing a single page of it or commenting in all these years, after it was moved (against my wishes) from "blogger dot com" to "blogdot dot com" and my blog title "BrutalHonesty" changed to "brutalhonesty2" (emphasis on the numeric "2") against my wishes or notification.
I don't know if it's "Brown Shirts" types in their organization or not, but there's alot of 3rd-party contracting out of Google, and alot of those Brown-shirt types around here, so it wouldn't surprise me in the least. WHY SHOULD GOOGLE CARE? Maybe they don't ...
-----------------------------------------------------
Sun Shevat 19, 5775 18:41PDT
Comments I wrote on my Facebook page: GOOGLE, PLEASE PAY ATTENTION:
Clayton Winton I just saw on NBC Nightly News a report about a new app that identifies the location of Police Officers. The Los Angeles Police Chief has sent a letter to Google to object. THIS IS ALSO AN LGBT ISSUE, so pay attention:
When you are in PUBLIC, and somebody IDENTIFIES you to others, that is giving-out your PERSONAL/PRIVATE info. That's how gay-bashings occur, and throughout history, that is how blacks were lynched; gays were beaten or killed; men, women and children raped, robbed or whatever.
Now, the Civil Rights 'people' are saying it's a matter of "free speech." That a REGISTRY of "types of people" is about "free speech." That's what was said before rounding-up Gays and Jews and marching us to death camps.
You do not have a right to identify personal info about anybody in Public. You do not have a right to take private info and 'share it' with anybody. You only have the right to do such things about yourself, by yourself.
I am not only Defending Policemen here, but LGBT too.
When you are in PUBLIC, and somebody IDENTIFIES you to others, that is giving-out your PERSONAL/PRIVATE info. That's how gay-bashings occur, and throughout history, that is how blacks were lynched; gays were beaten or killed; men, women and children raped, robbed or whatever.
Now, the Civil Rights 'people' are saying it's a matter of "free speech." That a REGISTRY of "types of people" is about "free speech." That's what was said before rounding-up Gays and Jews and marching us to death camps.
You do not have a right to identify personal info about anybody in Public. You do not have a right to take private info and 'share it' with anybody. You only have the right to do such things about yourself, by yourself.
I am not only Defending Policemen here, but LGBT too.
Friday, January 23, 2015
Defending Jews ; International Holocaust Remembrance Day
Fri Shevat 3, 2015
-- for: International Holocaust Remembrance Day (The UN General Assembly designated January 27—the anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz-Birkenau)
MY WORDS:
It is interesting, how Protestants always teach in bible studies how " ... the Jews always just argue(d) amongst themselves." Even in Catholicism, there are several priesthoods of Judeo-Christian descent that still promote such things, in that way.
Let me clarify: We are talking about time-periods and education. Today, when it comes to vast topics, such as terrorism, the 'lay-person' is not privy to any knowledge that prevents it, therefore cannot make policy about it, nor argue any strategy to handle, say, ISIS or ISL. Any effort in doing so, is devoid of real intel. There is no knowledge of military capability, weaponry, supply, funding, international treaty law or anything else, only news-clips and magazine articles. Only the experts can argue the case.
Likewise, during the time-period, long ago, there was no education, the "general public" being ignorant, incapable of reading and writing, no knowledge of law, monetary systems or forms of government. Today, each topic is specialized, and requires a PhD to be regarded as an "expert" in any one particular field. It takes a panel of such 'experts' to arrive at any agreements, or agree upon any course of action.
Therefore, which group of people, demographically, had the knowledge? Who had the education to discuss theology? Jews.
Further, in today's "pop-culture" lexicon, we mis-use the word "argument." An "argument" is not a squabble, it is not a "disagreement." An argument is one-side of a topic. An individual formulates their "take" or opinion about a topic, based-upon their level of real-life experience, training, education, and anything 'new' (news) as it becomes available, updating their opinion in real-time. The presentation of their opinion is their 'argument.' Another person does the same. The two discuss their arguments, civilly, with respect and dignity. Perhaps they'll both update their opinions (arguments) and arrive at some form of agreement as to future presentation and acts. That's the beauty of communication, of dialogue.
So, when the "christian" reads commentary about their "old" or "new" testaments (scriptures), and is told, "The Jews just argue amongst themselves," that does not imply they hatefully squabble nonstop. It never meant that. It's only pop-culture lexicon, colloquialism, ignorance within a so-called "educated society" that promotes that idea.
When doctors "argue amongst themselves" as to how to best handle the Ebola outbreak, there are no credible opinions (arguments) to be taken into consideration from 'laymen' (non medical-doctors and disease-control experts).
All the "old testament" came from, and is a translation (transliteration) of, the Torah, the first five books of Moses, Genesis, Exodus, Leveticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy. Then, all the other 'books' of "the prophets," and then, "the writings," which comprise the remainder of the "christian bible's." Old Testament. It was a gift from scholarly Jews who were the only experts, therefore could only be, and were, and in many cases still are, the credible arguers of such topics.
See how that works? It's simple. And it was never intended to be "overly complicated."
Kind regards, always,
CLAYTON LEON WINTON citizen#C03183395 קלייטון ליאון וינטון
Thursday, January 22, 2015
Defending Speaker Boehner II
Update: Thu Shevat 2, 5775 08:30PDT
On the news ticker this morning, on GMA, was a blurb about how the House Speaker, John Boehner breached protocol by inviting Israeli PM Netanyahu to address Congress. I do not that that is correct. The Speaker may invite anybody to address Congress. As to whether or not all the 'chips' fall-in to place, and all the 'approvals' signed-off, etc., is another matter. No singular individual can set the agenda of Congress, in other words. Obviously.
-- well, maybe terrorists. Or, at least disrupt proceedings.
And the subtle promotion of PM Benjamin Netanyahu being somehow correlated with "terror" in a derogatory way, seems to be the agenda of many. It's Palestinians and their supporters here and abroad, cheering with Iranians and Chechyns and Ugurs for the utter destruction of Russian, US'an, China's and Israel's governments, afterall, the EU inclusive.
It was similar forces that defeated Germany in WWI, then turned it over to a PhD cabal to rebuild it into a powerhouse of fascist militancy run by PhDs that attempted to overthrow the world just twenty years later; the German Citizen scapegoated.
I don't think the world is that complicated; just presented as "greatly complicated" for evil people to repeat the evils of history. History never repeats itself, only evil people repeat evil deeds from history, against the rest of us, each and every individual an inherently unique and priceless life, their potential to pursue happiness and liberty according to their own Freewill, unless waylaid or circumvented by evil design.
I invited PM Netanyahu to address my country, my people, my world, my Legislative Branch within my government, as a citizen. I have that right. Thank you, Speaker Boehner, for extending my invitation to one of the most inspirational people in the world during my lifetime.
Did you know his picture on my list of Inspirational People on my Facebook page was defaced by cybervandals? By haters? Did you know, Speaker Boehner, that just because I displayed his picture, and the picture of Eva Lassman, Holocaust Survivor, that my Facebook page was attacked? That my display of the TaNaKh on my Facebook page brought hatred against my person, my efforts, my pursuits of free expression and free speech and freedom to express in my own words my faith?
-- they distorted my pics; they made my Inspirational People and my Book List, the TaNaKh, junk? Did you know that?
-- and when I expressed displeasure, was accussed of being "emotionally unstable"? Did you know that?
It's shradenfraude, the "new, improved, cleaner, better, brighter, whiter, super-duper more efficient, less expensive" version, but the costs are the same: incalculable.
LET PM NETANYAHU ADDRESS CONGRESS AND THANK YOU!
Kind regards, always,
CLAYTON LEON WINTON citizen#C03183395
Wednesday, January 21, 2015
Defending Michael Strahan
Defending MS
Wed Shevat 1, 5775
Recently, I watched a Barbara Walters special, something about the "Ten Most Fascinating People of 2014." It was much like all the other specials of hers, her 'fascination' is only about wealth, money.
I find fascinating things about most people. The single-mom that works two jobs, and somehow raises two kids, she drives junk, wears thrift-clothes, but somehow manages to take her kids to the Cathedral for Mass and offer donations to the needy, a few coins or a loaf of homemade bread. She fixes her junk car alone; hammers a broken step, carries her own firewood and washes many of her clothes by hand. A credential was something for "rich folk" and kids that lived at home 'til they were 25 or 30, to her. She is by no means stupid, but 'equal opportunities' is a myth. She reminds me of my grandmother. She worked liked that, and was one of the best cooks I've ever known.
Or the mechanic that owns his own business, that fixes anything, oftentimes for free, or trade for some 'favor' or another, usually a 'favor' that is shortchange to be certain, but helping others, time and money allowing, is the blue-blood in his veins. He supports various clubs, and even though he has a plethora of "personal issues" that would make him "unsavory company" around kids and 'mormons," he's done more nice things for all the 'unsavory types' that the 'church crowd' hates than a dozen church Wards and various Protestant groups combined.
And there's a man with a head injury from a logging accident, that lives like a "cave man" by "modern standards" or to "city folk." But what he isn't doing is raping, robbing or murdering "in the name of jesus" or "allah" or hating for either.
There's the retired school teacher whose wife died of MS, who is so traumatized by it, a trauma few understand or can even comprehend, and yet still remembers the names and is still concerned for the school kids he taught decades and decades ago, to this day. I learned more from he and his wife than most. They will always be on "my list" of Fascinating People, not just this year, and not just last year, but every year.
Walters interviewed Strahan. He's the guy on GMA on ABC, the black guy with the 'gap' between his front teeth. He seems to be everywhere on TV these days, that Entertainment Conglomerate's mediocre effort to give the appearance, a facade to be certain, of 'equality' and 'equal opportunities'. He faced the same thing on the school grounds and then on the football field. He retired from the NFL a millionaire. Now, he talks and talks and talks with the "women in the morning," and gets paid for it -- probably the only way any man can handle it. lol
Anyway, Walters' interview was troubling. She SET HIM UP.
It's been awhile, and I'm just quickly typing my thoughts, before pasting this to my blog at http://www.BrutalHonesty.Blogger.Com ... oh, wait ... they moved me to BlogSpot.com and never asked for it or wanted it. Anyway, first, she asked about the gap between his teeth, and he said outright he doesn't have to pretend anything, or fake anything, "I was born this way," in essence. That proves self-esteem more than anything.
-- THEN, she set him up, talking about "comes naturally," being "a natural," as though he never had to work for anything, he was "born with it", handed to him on a "silver spoon" or something.
"No! I'm not natural!" he replied -- unawares of her SET UP. She ENTRAPPED him, into using words that claim he is a FAKE.
Backup a moment: everything about a female these days is FAKE, fake hair, fake teeth, fake hair color, fake nails, fake pre-pubescent body-hair "look and feel," fake boobs, fake, skin tone, fake skin coloring, fake, fake, fake ... and they work hard at FAKING "natural." There is nothing "natural" about hair dye, or the chemical soup of skin-color changing makeups, lip gloss, eye shadow, etc., or removing one's body-hair to simulate a fake pre-pubescent. It's like a "job-requirement" for a woman to work in broadcasting, or be seen in public, and the very reason why Islamists hate it, and Islamic women wear Burkas, to celebrate diversity, not fakeness, like Drag Queens, which is what Drag Queens satirize, btw, always trying to "out-do" one another with "bigger is better" blown-out-of-proportion melodrama-styling and behaviors. Drag is satire of that, for that reason, or who-knows where Womens' Rights would be today, eh? To-the-ankle gowns and head-coverings, like the Amish, or be stoned-to-death? Ticketed? Denied employment, housing, credit?
The point is, it is NATURAL for a MAN to give EVERYTHING toward what they endeavor. He is a "natural", a natural man, and proves it, by his hard work, discipline, and efforts to do outreach in a country still divided by racist and bigoted ideals, systems and institutions. He wears his natural teeth because he isn't trying to be FAKE, or prove he's "better than you" or me or anybody. He works that hard to do the best he can with what he has, what "g*d gave him naturally."
My mom had bacterial meningitis when I was born, and was very ill, she almost died, and nursed me on bad milk, and I got sick and almost died. I've struggled with infections my entire life, high fevers, and things like that which caused some brain and kidney damage, and then had my head cracked open when I was 5, and multiple concussions. I see halos around things and have tremors up the right side of my body, and need the finger of my left hand against my right index finger to sign my name or use a pen or it's too shaky to read. I have to try harder at things in order to accomplish anything, and in most cases, "mediocre" is a blood, sweat and tears major-event that exhausted me and all my resources, and even when I'm laughed at, I'm proud of myself, and those that ridicule and scorn, can take their supremacy-issues and fuckoff.
We all try as best we can, with what we've got, and give thanks for it, cuz it could be so much less. I am not "slow" but to the "fastest," I'm sure I am. I am small, I do not have the strength of a giant, either. So?
I have exercises I do regularly, speech pathology, enunciation of words, and learning word-substitutions for words that my tongue, in my dialect, cannot pronounce or trips over all-too-often. I read the TaNaKh aloud and give commentary, in private, for example. I don't care if somebody thinks I'm "talking to myself" or "talking to g*d" or "talking to demons" -- why are they horning-in to my privates?
I read piano music for both mental alacrity and finger dexterity, and struggle with it. I don't do it to prove anything to anybody. I don't do it in the "hope" of a career in it. I have no experience in accompaniment. But some people seem to think that my efforts at it should be used to judge me, humiliate me, shame me, embarrass me, in the pathetic attempt at making themselves-out to "look" or "feel" superior/supreme. That's what the Brown Shirts did, too.
-- if my cheeks burn, it is not because I am ashamed, or humiliated, or embarassed about myself at all ... I'm not mad, either ... but embarrassed for those doing it, as they loft themselves OnHigh, in a PillarOfCloud (complicated explanations, replete with ridicule and scorn of me), judging me, perverting testimony to pervert the favor of the Mighty (whatever church or group or company or family they work for or desire attention for themselves for).
But I have full college Music Education, Pedagogy, Theory and Orchestration training. I am by no means stupid, nor ignorant about these things.
Anyway, everybody has challenges, and the playing-field is never completely 'level.'
Very few will achieve the speaking-skills and personability-skills of a Michael Strahan. Never judge "the rest" by a few, or one's expectations are always disappointed. He is exceptional, in that he is a NATURAL MAN and proved just how hard a man can push themselves, can achieve, given opportunities and circumstances as he was allowed (provided by g*d?). He didn't waste a thing. And he certainly doesn't fake it. That is inspiring to all people equally, man or woman, of any persuasion. (yes, I'm Gay, but not attracted to him; I want to make that clear; I'm not writing this because of some secret fascination or anything like that; frankly, men that size, scare me, regardless of skin-color, religion, language, nationality, heritage or anything else).
So, I am defending Michael Strahan, because what Walters did was a SET UP, part of a much broader agenda, in a 'field' unlike any he's played-in before, until quite recently. I do not know of Walters did that on her own, cognatively by design, or subliminally, or what. I don't really care. Her "fascination" is all "money oriented," mine is not. Each to their own.
Kind regards, always,
CLAYTON LEON WINTON citizen#C03183395
Tuesday, January 20, 2015
State of the Union -- Defending Job
Defending The Union
Tue January 20, 2014
Tue Tevet 29, 5774
"Did I hide my transgressions like Adam,
bury my wrongdoings in my bosom,
that I should [now] fear the great multitude,
and am shattered by the contempt of families,
so that I keep silent and do not step outdoors!?" (TaNaKh Kethuvim J.31.33)
I AM JUST GAY, I WAS BORN THIS WAY
-- and after Charlie Hebdo, who can defend excuses for repressing, oppressing or censoring the world from MY WORDS? ... from MY FREE-EXPRESSIONS of FAITH in MY OWN WORDS, or anything else?
Did the world not see the riots? The 'demonstrations' AGAINST FREEDOM? AGAINST FREE-EXPRESSION? AGAINST FREEDOM OF SPEECH? AGAINST FREEDOM OF PRESS? AGAINST FREEDOM OF RELIGIOUS FREE-EXPRESSION?
Did the world not see the Chechyns by the tens-of-thousands faking their 'rights' are being 'insulted,' therefore condeming Russians WITH United States'ans, demanding our deaths, that we be 'wiped off the map' together?
Did the world not see the the Palestinians cheering with the Iranians and the Chechyns that we United States'ans and Russians and Israel-ites be "erased from the face of the Earth?"
And did the world not see the Ugars hating the Chinese for the same reason, hoping for our collective deaths? Merely for allowing FREE EXPRESSION OF FAITH?
Is that not the greatest misunderstanding in the history of the entire HumanityFamily (Human Family), or what? These people hate us for freely expressing our faith in our own freely-chosen words, while claiming insult-and-injury from every utterance of our freely-expressed words, faking 'wounds' in imagined 'attacks' of fake 'battles' with imagined 'weapons' of WORDS, as excuses to hammer us as "negatives" against their merciless "positive-cross-signs," using the points of their own hypocritical forked-tongues as nails.
-- then, using the mass-delusion of fake 'wounds' , lashing-out to spill real blood and, then say it's about "love."
HAS THERE EVER BEEN A GREATER HUMAN MISUNDERSTANDING?
And this President, in just a few moments, is about to give a speech about WHAT, exactly? He should hang his head in shame and apologize, and turn the floor over to me. Let me explain it, because obviously, his endless-speeches, 'billions and billions' or photo-op'ing WORDS have aggravated everybody and everything, mollified a few (at best), an endless DRONING. No wonder why he surrounds himself with paid supporters, his own cheerleading squad -- how convenient.
BELL CHAMBER
-- (I'll wait for the DRONING to end -- then add my comments) -- lol :)
The opening statement of POTUS during SOTU 2015 was how this century began with TERROR and it's been a long-protracted war ever since.
-- but he withdrew the troops too early, which protracted the wars and fomented militancy.
POTUS then talks about the struggles of family, citing an individual (Rebekah (sp?)) -- saying she doesn't want a "hand-out," just more 'help.'
-- but his political-entity is about raising taxes to job-secure future-generations of college-grads, professionally unionizing, 'donating-back' to his political-entity, for more, more, more, perks, benefits and raises (why we are trillions and trillions of dollars in debt).
-- further, that approach destroyed the single bread-winner family;
-- further still, it's destroying the two-bread-winner family;
-- so, I ask you POTUS: what's next EXACTLY? A giant bureaucracy of job-security for future-generations of college-grads, professionally-unionizing, 'donating-back' to your political-entity of the Legislative Branch for more, more, more (perks, benefits and raises) at taxpayer expense, and calling it a "CHILD CARE HEALTH AND EDUCATION REFORM ACT" ?
-- really? or, the most-likely outcome: a 'triple-bread-winner-family' ASSAULT? (Child labor camps disguised as "schools")?
The "infrustructure plan" is only job-security for future-generations of college-grads, professionally unionizing, 'donating-back' to POTUS' political-entity of the Legislative Branch, at taxpayer expense, facism in disguise, with a facade of "private ownership" which is overly-taxed, overly-regulated, and as National And World Hero To The People Edward Snowden proved, an excuse to scapegoat a few cops and troops (in or out of uniform) while private-data is filtered, scrutinized, dissected and analyzed by Senators in secret; said data used to find "new ways" to "job-secure" more "donors" via a Predatory Credentialing System to their own political-entity of the Legislative Branch at taxpayer expense : (read: VOTE-BUYING IN DISGUISE).
Where can a man-in-need go to work RIGHT NOW? To pick-up a bucket, fill it with rocks, carry it from POINT-A to POINT-B and GET PAID?
-- now, it's an excuse for paperwork-pushers, their own "job-security", to fill-out forms, type at computers, make phone-calls, hold endless meetings about jobs, about work, instead of letting men work for real.
-- POTUS' "vision" is more layers of bureaucracy instead of JOBS, at taxpayer-expense, saying that is "development," "economic growth," "prosperity," but if it were not for Bush-Era stimulus monies, mis-applied to fake "prosperity" today, there wouldn't be "job growth." It's a facade.
Look at ENERGY as an example: The President says the United States "no longer dependent on foreign oil" ; he dlayed the Keystone Pipeline, and as a result, energy prices sky-rocketed. It was a gamble to "stimulate" internal-investment in energy production and resource exploitation. This was to promote "alternatives." The resultant super-inflated prices gave FALSE HOPE to many private investors.
-- "competitor" energy-producing companies/countries increased output to lower prices, to stimulate and secure future-demand/need for their products (oil, gas, etc).
-- now, with lower prices at the pump, all those private investors have no way to be profitable, because pro-unionized workers, 'donating-back' to POTUS' political-entity for "job-security" for themselves, and more 'perks, benefits, etc.,' needs $50-70/bl to stay employed.
-- now, those 'alternatives,' which have consumed more natural resources than ever before in history just to transport, let alone construct, has destroyed infrustructure faster than ever before in history, while those pro-unionized 'workers' demand "higher wages, perks and benefits."
-- now, that same political-entity will put pressure on the Auto Mfg sector to produce bigger cars and trucks with lower MPG than ever, to increase consumption, 'stimulate' demand,' to 'increase-prices' at the gas-pump and home heating-oil (higher prices pays for the union-jobs SHORT-TERM ONLY while depleting resources FASTEST); which will increase carbon-footprints, which will be the excuse to tax the end-user more (driver and family).
POTUS says the "average" pay approx $740 {LESS} annually on gas. But his tax MANdates were triple that, and as a result, higher-prices for products/services, and endless local-legislative-bodies raising more fees, fines, taxes, etc., erases that seven-fold, especially if an "average family" has a student and pays tuition for anything, anywhere.
WEDGE-ISSUES and POTUS mentions " ... what I have seen ..." referring to several items, including GAY MARRIAGE, but it's not MARRIAGE EQUALITY and it's still ILLEGAL in most places, and is being used as a REGISTRY of 'sexual deviants'.
-- look, I was born gay. I never had a sexual relationship with a woman; I never cowered behind her, hiding in a 'closet' of deception, living a double-life, lieing and cheating. Those are not 'gay issues.' Those are bi-sexual issues. I don't care if someone was married to a woman, divorced and is now in a same-sex relationship or not. What they told their ex-spouse and kids was that they were "victims of their sexuality." That was their EXCUSE. I don't have excuses. I am just gay -- I was born this way.
Furthermore, be they man or woman, now referring to themselves as "gay" or "lesbian," they are increasingly the "face of the gay-nation," but the only discipline they ever learned was how to cheat and lie. They took it to work with them, they took it to church with them as well. I DID NO SUCH THING.
I am the "face of gay" in this nation, in this world, in reality. They've killed nearly all of us, and the Lesbians claiming they are "gay" only adds to the confusion. It was SUGGESTED in the 1950's that we homosexual men call ourselves "gay" because the bible-thumping women spit the word "homo" with venom. We formed a Gay Rights Movement. THEN, we allied with homosexual-women, who chose their own name, "Lesbian" to define their own NATURAL BORN EXISTENCE, different from the "biblical homos" the bible-thumping 'church-lady' hated.
We took our first case to court to define the difference between a homosexual man and a homosexual woman. GAY_RIGHTS_FOR_DUMMIES_101
When a woman refers to herself as 'gay,' because she is 'homosexual' (or in a same-sex relationship), she is arguing against GAY RIGHTS. Because that is the argument we won in court, that it is NOT A CHOICE, it is NOT AN ATTITUDE, it is NOT A 'club-to-join', it is NOT AN ILLNESS or DISORDER.
This President wastes the time of the world, painting pie-in-the-sky cartoon-imagery, while ignoring the most important topics facing all of Humanity today.
Kind regards, always,
CLAYTON LEON WINTON citizen#C03183395
-- Sen Marco Rubio on NBC: this guy is in an artificial environment, and lends support to the thought that a Constitutional change is in order: an increase in the Age Requirement to be elected Senator, to 45. He is smart, quick, but developmentally-stunted in REAL LIFE and the REALITIES OF LIVING IT. It's as though he can 're-frame' the text-books faster, so therefore is "more qualified" to 'lead'? Good heavens!
-- Rep Ernst: a carefully worded response, short and sweat. I'm glad Cathy did not give it this year; I saw her at Mayor Condon's annual address last year, and I'm glad she was there. As for Rep Ernst, I stand with her in the (not only a sentiment but a reality) that we must work together to solve anything. And I'm glad she did not engage in ad hominem or nitpick speeches. But there is so much more to say/do. And the COMMON ENEMIES of COMMON MAN, be s/he of this citizenship or any other, of this political or religious persuasion or any other, are more abundantly-clear than ever: Predatory Credentialing System, worldwide, profiting from atop the rubble, misery, confusion and grief.
" ... only the LIVING can give THANKS ... " (TaNaKh NEVI'IM I.39.19)
Shalom and Amen.
Kind regards, always,
CLAYTON LEON WINTON (the real name I was born with and I have never used any other, citizen ID#C03183395)
-- follow-ups: MY WORDS about NBC broadcast post-SOTU, Wed Shevat 1, 5775
If Senator Harry Reed had that bad eye amputated, he'd be 50-percent less offended by all he sees.
Healthcare: you know what they told me when I ended up at the ER after a single-person accident? "self-inflicted.'
---------------------
Defending the NFL; this is what? De-flate-gate? ROFL. Perhaps an Investigator named "Starr Kennedy" can be found to investigate? $54-million dollar budget. Results will be something about, what? Blue-dresses and real-estate?
Look, there are some people that are quite particular and peculiar about INFLATION; they'll add 5psi to tires for highway use, and subtract 5psi for city driving; they'll reduce psi for volleyballs in cool weather cuz it hurts, same with soccer balls, to do headers or whatever. Sometimes, pressure-gauges are finicky, so sometimes, temperature or moisture can make the gauges read incorrect results, but "close enough." LET IT GO.
-- I own some riverfront property. I have an airbed I use to float around the bend, a 'horseshoe-loop' bend in the river. If I inflate the airbed in the morning, and it sits in the sun all day, it gets really big, like it's going to pop. But it doesn't. Then, when the sun sets, it looks under-inflated. Figure it out, geniuses. :)
-- I'm thinking that some people would actually prefer to accuse coaches and staff of some great conspiracy and fraud, some super-deception, and would actually be thankful to spending $54 million dollars 'investigating' such silliness; so, instead of a resultant of "blue dresses and real estate," perhaps it would be, BlueBalls and TailGates? lol
-- seriously, it's just a diversion from far more important things. Look, the new NFL balls were inflated to proper psi; then they traveled, were in a storage container over the engine compartment of a bus or something, or plane, whatever; the air molecules were excited by the increase in temperature, the 'fabric' of the balls stretched-out a bit; but when the field temperature was lowered, at game time, the air molecules settled down, and the internal pressure decreased. SIMPLE. LET IT GO. We've far more important things to spend energy and resources upon, than squabble about MenInTights playing with Balls;
-- so, what about SEGREGATED SPORTS, a JimCrow-ist holdout to reinforce Jim Crow-ist attitudes? Where is the NFL Team of Females going to the SuperBowl? Until then, or co-ed teams, it's SSSegregation, liars.
--------------------------
INFLATION: I'm already paying nearly $5 for a loaf of Orowheat Jewish Rye Bread, you liars.
---------------------------
Foreign Policy, re: CUBA: can I go there yet? No. Nor anybody else. Now, the same people that have re-authorized total sanctions and eliminated free-trade, free-markets, free-travel and free-associations, significantly harming economy and reducing tax-revenues for State, are now traveling freely to Cuba at taxpayer expense, but if I do, I'd be ARRESTED? Then the same should occur upon their return. Either it's about EQUALITY and JUSTICE FOR ALL, or it's FRAUD.
-----------------------------
LIBERTY'S PARABLE
There was once a man from Belle, a far-away island, cracked open by earthquake and sunk beneath the sea;
-- his name was Liberty.
Looking for a new and improved way of life, he came to the 'land of the free,' as it was called, the country name, "Chains."
He lit a cigarette and was issued a ticket. It had been issued by a black man, a descendent of slaves that had once cultivated tobacco for no pay. The taxes from slave-labor agricultural products built Chains. Now, the black man, a police officer, enjoyed his income from taxpayers of Chains, issuing such tickets, presumably.
Liberty had no money to pay the ticket and was arrested for "failing to appear," so he spent ten days in Chain's jail.
Hungry, he saw a man washing windshields of horseless-carriages as the vehicles stopped at intervals, directed by colored lights and more black men blowing whistles and waving their arms. He removed his undershirt, put his topshirt back on, and walked over to a stopped vehicle, polishing the glass with his precious clothes and a smile.
He was issued a ticket for disrupting traffic and failure to register for employment and produce a vendors' license.
Liberty had no money to pay the ticket and was arrested for "failing to appear," so he spent ten months in Chain's jail, 'compliments-of' Chains' taxpayers, but he wondered who was actually working and paying Chains' taxes?
Hungry, after being released, he wondered what real work was to be done? Should he take a uniform by force and issue tickets? Is that how the former slaves' kids survive? Perhaps he should cut-out the 'middle-man' and just demand money up-front from 'scafflaws'?
He was about to ask a man that was smoking, but the man handed him a pack of cigarettes and walked away without a word. But Liberty had quit smoking in jail. So he sold loose cigarettes for a few sheckles each, helping the needy while helping himself, almost 'earning' enough money for a meal before he was beaten and arrested by descendants of slaves for selling loose, untaxed cigarettes.
His money was confiscated and he was convicted of many crimes, including "resisting arrest," but he had not swung or struck anyone. He spent ten years of a twenty-year 'sentence' in Chain's jail, 'compliments-of' Chains' taxpayers.
Hungry, released 'early' for 'good-behavior,' he discovered he was now too old to work ...
THE END
------------------------
SOTU 2015, Last Thoughts:
I just typed my internet blog addy into the browser from the privacy of my own home and was taken to a different blog, called, "Random Thoughts," which is not my blog. Somehow, my blog name, this one, "BrutalHonesty," was moved to "BrutalHonesty2.BlogSpot.Com" -- it now has a "2" after it -- so if anybody looks it up on Google Search, they are taken to a completely different blogger and blog that has nothing to do with me. I wonder how many of my blogs have had their internet addy re-directed and now if somebody looks me up, they end up somewhere else, reading somebody else?
If you ("you" is figurative, of course) bought an airline ticket to Havana, Cuba, how would you feel if you were let off the plane in Anchorage, Alaska?
What about my main blog, ResuscitateHumanity? This is an exploration of my faith, and all these blogs are tied together from my main blog, which should be at http://www.blogger.com and always had "blogger.com" after the blog name in the internet address. Now, my blogs have been moved, and moved again, apparently, without my knowledge or consent. Is this the "new, improved, super-duper leaner, cleaner, better, brighter, whiter, more efficient, less expensive" Google? Is that how Google does business? Is that their business model? Their MISSION STATEMENT?
I think it's mean. It inflicts a shradenfraude provocation upon end-users, which in this case, is me, the blogger. Do they have company uniforms there? Brown Shirts, perhaps?
------------------------
Speaking (figuratively) of Cuba, since the President, POTUS Obama, mentioned Cuba and a "normalization of relations," which is something I have advocated for my entire life -- afterall, it's a nation of Native Americans -- it's 90-miles from our shore and if we can't get along with them, how can this country be taken seriously anywhere? How can this country say anything about "celebrating diversity" and "equality" at all, when they hate me too?
So, considering that, keeping it in mind, what I predict from the Good 'Ole Boys club, of which their BigMouth spokesperson, the Salesman In Chief, reading teleprompters like an animated talking-head, endlessly, is this: tap-in to a nation of approx 11-million cheap-labor workforce and exploit it, then blame Republicans as a diversion, as usual.
There are billions worth of investments that were Nationalized after the Cuban revolution. No compensation to those private companies and owners and investors has ever been given, or discussed. What about reparations? I think that should be the only type of "taxpayer bailout" there is, frankly. Unfortunately it would have to be 1950's dollars, not 2015 "maximum phaaat-bottom line" dollars, but at least it would be honest and fair. Well, fairer than nothing. Yes, the asset, had the monies been liquid in the 50's, would have, could have --- emphasis on 'could have' -- been invested and possibly -- emphasis on 'possibly' -- returned gains. But there is no promise of that, nor guarantee of that. And, further still, I predict that if a computer model were to analyze every dollar from the time period, PointOfTime/Sale forward to this moment, losses would outstrip gains in the majority of cases, products, services and real properties. Truthfully, I think only 9% of those 1950's dollars would have produced gains to 2015 (today). The bulk of it, 91% a loss.
-- that's why I think it's fair. That's why I think it's honest, and at least it proves integrity by compensating the wronged, finally, after all these years. We can't make inheritance rights just "materialize" out of "thin air," and we can't just assume that the real property wasn't destroyed by fire or hurricane over the past five decades, or any figurative or metaphorical equivalent for any product or service.
I think the Republican plan, whatever it turns-out to be, and I have pushed hard for freedom of association and freedom of travel and equal rights my entire life, in normalization of US/CUBA relations and free markets -- not using people as PawnsOfWar because of generation-spanning Legislative pissin' matches -- so, whatever the Republican plan turns-out to be, I ask for fairness, both to Cuban Labor, business sector, family and tourism. A gov't sponsored co-nation financial product must be hashed-out. Don't make careers out of it, and cap fees from the get-go. Please.
Thank you, and kind regards, always,
CLAYTON LEON WINTON
Thu Shevat 2, 5775 06:39PST
---------------------------------------------------
Followups: Thu Shevat 9, 5775, 09:36PDT
Jobless claims at near 15-yr LOW but ONE IN FIVE KIDS ON FOOD STAMPS, two headlines in the news this morning. There is nothing "healthy" about such an economy.
Firstly, if true, "fifteen-yr low for jobless claims," that implies labor is less productive than ever, wages lower than ever, inflation greater than ever, because kids aren't being properly fed.
I suspect something else: the "job-stats" are extrapolated from ever "finessed" data-sets to produce POLITICAL RESULTS, not factual economic results.
That's the typical Higher Education's Predatory Credentialing System "positive thinking" brainwashing: SAY ANYTHING AND ACCUSE ALL WHOM QUESTION OF BEING 'NEGATIVE," then laugh, and walk away, ignoring reality as usual.
Meanwhile, the same amount of CASH that tax-dodging APPLE INC is storing OFF-SHORE, $178Billion, would erase Greece's debt, save the EU and defend a strategic and economic ally for the U.S, the EU itself.
Meanwhile, all the APPLE INC jobs are MADE in CHINA where workers earn, after "technical training," a couple/few-hundred dollars a month. The cost of the iPhone to make is probably under fifty dollars a unit, yet sells in the U.S. and EU for $600-800 each.
Meanwhile, the costs to government and society of the APPLE INC "success" is ever-growing:
1) deforestation and strip-mining, and the consumption of natural resources, mostly fossil fuels to smelt the oars to make iPhones, the 'dirty-energy' consumption to run the factories (mostly coal-fired electrical energy plants), producing the greatest Carbon Footprint of any manufacturing process in history, greenhouse gases and other toxins leaching into air, soils and drinking-water there and worldwide from disposal and discarded units, etc., yet China takes the blame according to the Obama Admin who is proposing import/export taxation and various tariffs, against China and Chinese companies that are NOT involved in that.
2) Governments "over-stressed" -- there is the fact that distracted-drivers, texting-while-driving (or talking), is over-stressing Emergency Services in multiple countries; there is all the property damage associated with that, police reports, maintenance crews, disposal, hospital services, ambulance services, law enforcement issues ... and all the wildlife, livestock, pets and pedestrians injured and/or killed.
3) social ails : there's more to it than just "distractions" -- there is the sociopathy factor; there is the hacking issues, and a good case could be made that APPLE INC technologies have been employed in every hacking incident worldwide, credit card fraud, bank fraud, data vandalism, cyber vandalism, privacy intrusions and privacy invasions, illegal surveillance by perverts, all of it. Meanwhile, I walked into a bar, and everybody in it, picked-up their iPhones and faked being "super-duper important and busy" ... not a single person was talking, having a conversation, or even said "hello," which is increasingly what will be remembered as the molestation of the Legacy of JOBS.
-- Sen Marco Rubio on NBC: this guy is in an artificial environment, and lends support to the thought that a Constitutional change is in order: an increase in the Age Requirement to be elected Senator, to 45. He is smart, quick, but developmentally-stunted in REAL LIFE and the REALITIES OF LIVING IT. It's as though he can 're-frame' the text-books faster, so therefore is "more qualified" to 'lead'? Good heavens!
-- Rep Ernst: a carefully worded response, short and sweat. I'm glad Cathy did not give it this year; I saw her at Mayor Condon's annual address last year, and I'm glad she was there. As for Rep Ernst, I stand with her in the (not only a sentiment but a reality) that we must work together to solve anything. And I'm glad she did not engage in ad hominem or nitpick speeches. But there is so much more to say/do. And the COMMON ENEMIES of COMMON MAN, be s/he of this citizenship or any other, of this political or religious persuasion or any other, are more abundantly-clear than ever: Predatory Credentialing System, worldwide, profiting from atop the rubble, misery, confusion and grief.
" ... only the LIVING can give THANKS ... " (TaNaKh NEVI'IM I.39.19)
Shalom and Amen.
Kind regards, always,
CLAYTON LEON WINTON (the real name I was born with and I have never used any other, citizen ID#C03183395)
-- follow-ups: MY WORDS about NBC broadcast post-SOTU, Wed Shevat 1, 5775
If Senator Harry Reed had that bad eye amputated, he'd be 50-percent less offended by all he sees.
Healthcare: you know what they told me when I ended up at the ER after a single-person accident? "self-inflicted.'
---------------------
Defending the NFL; this is what? De-flate-gate? ROFL. Perhaps an Investigator named "Starr Kennedy" can be found to investigate? $54-million dollar budget. Results will be something about, what? Blue-dresses and real-estate?
Look, there are some people that are quite particular and peculiar about INFLATION; they'll add 5psi to tires for highway use, and subtract 5psi for city driving; they'll reduce psi for volleyballs in cool weather cuz it hurts, same with soccer balls, to do headers or whatever. Sometimes, pressure-gauges are finicky, so sometimes, temperature or moisture can make the gauges read incorrect results, but "close enough." LET IT GO.
-- I own some riverfront property. I have an airbed I use to float around the bend, a 'horseshoe-loop' bend in the river. If I inflate the airbed in the morning, and it sits in the sun all day, it gets really big, like it's going to pop. But it doesn't. Then, when the sun sets, it looks under-inflated. Figure it out, geniuses. :)
-- I'm thinking that some people would actually prefer to accuse coaches and staff of some great conspiracy and fraud, some super-deception, and would actually be thankful to spending $54 million dollars 'investigating' such silliness; so, instead of a resultant of "blue dresses and real estate," perhaps it would be, BlueBalls and TailGates? lol
-- seriously, it's just a diversion from far more important things. Look, the new NFL balls were inflated to proper psi; then they traveled, were in a storage container over the engine compartment of a bus or something, or plane, whatever; the air molecules were excited by the increase in temperature, the 'fabric' of the balls stretched-out a bit; but when the field temperature was lowered, at game time, the air molecules settled down, and the internal pressure decreased. SIMPLE. LET IT GO. We've far more important things to spend energy and resources upon, than squabble about MenInTights playing with Balls;
-- so, what about SEGREGATED SPORTS, a JimCrow-ist holdout to reinforce Jim Crow-ist attitudes? Where is the NFL Team of Females going to the SuperBowl? Until then, or co-ed teams, it's SSSegregation, liars.
--------------------------
INFLATION: I'm already paying nearly $5 for a loaf of Orowheat Jewish Rye Bread, you liars.
---------------------------
Foreign Policy, re: CUBA: can I go there yet? No. Nor anybody else. Now, the same people that have re-authorized total sanctions and eliminated free-trade, free-markets, free-travel and free-associations, significantly harming economy and reducing tax-revenues for State, are now traveling freely to Cuba at taxpayer expense, but if I do, I'd be ARRESTED? Then the same should occur upon their return. Either it's about EQUALITY and JUSTICE FOR ALL, or it's FRAUD.
-----------------------------
LIBERTY'S PARABLE
-- his name was Liberty.
THE END
------------------------
SOTU 2015, Last Thoughts:
I just typed my internet blog addy into the browser from the privacy of my own home and was taken to a different blog, called, "Random Thoughts," which is not my blog. Somehow, my blog name, this one, "BrutalHonesty," was moved to "BrutalHonesty2.BlogSpot.Com" -- it now has a "2" after it -- so if anybody looks it up on Google Search, they are taken to a completely different blogger and blog that has nothing to do with me. I wonder how many of my blogs have had their internet addy re-directed and now if somebody looks me up, they end up somewhere else, reading somebody else?
If you ("you" is figurative, of course) bought an airline ticket to Havana, Cuba, how would you feel if you were let off the plane in Anchorage, Alaska?
What about my main blog, ResuscitateHumanity? This is an exploration of my faith, and all these blogs are tied together from my main blog, which should be at http://www.blogger.com and always had "blogger.com" after the blog name in the internet address. Now, my blogs have been moved, and moved again, apparently, without my knowledge or consent. Is this the "new, improved, super-duper leaner, cleaner, better, brighter, whiter, more efficient, less expensive" Google? Is that how Google does business? Is that their business model? Their MISSION STATEMENT?
I think it's mean. It inflicts a shradenfraude provocation upon end-users, which in this case, is me, the blogger. Do they have company uniforms there? Brown Shirts, perhaps?
------------------------
Speaking (figuratively) of Cuba, since the President, POTUS Obama, mentioned Cuba and a "normalization of relations," which is something I have advocated for my entire life -- afterall, it's a nation of Native Americans -- it's 90-miles from our shore and if we can't get along with them, how can this country be taken seriously anywhere? How can this country say anything about "celebrating diversity" and "equality" at all, when they hate me too?
So, considering that, keeping it in mind, what I predict from the Good 'Ole Boys club, of which their BigMouth spokesperson, the Salesman In Chief, reading teleprompters like an animated talking-head, endlessly, is this: tap-in to a nation of approx 11-million cheap-labor workforce and exploit it, then blame Republicans as a diversion, as usual.
There are billions worth of investments that were Nationalized after the Cuban revolution. No compensation to those private companies and owners and investors has ever been given, or discussed. What about reparations? I think that should be the only type of "taxpayer bailout" there is, frankly. Unfortunately it would have to be 1950's dollars, not 2015 "maximum phaaat-bottom line" dollars, but at least it would be honest and fair. Well, fairer than nothing. Yes, the asset, had the monies been liquid in the 50's, would have, could have --- emphasis on 'could have' -- been invested and possibly -- emphasis on 'possibly' -- returned gains. But there is no promise of that, nor guarantee of that. And, further still, I predict that if a computer model were to analyze every dollar from the time period, PointOfTime/Sale forward to this moment, losses would outstrip gains in the majority of cases, products, services and real properties. Truthfully, I think only 9% of those 1950's dollars would have produced gains to 2015 (today). The bulk of it, 91% a loss.
-- that's why I think it's fair. That's why I think it's honest, and at least it proves integrity by compensating the wronged, finally, after all these years. We can't make inheritance rights just "materialize" out of "thin air," and we can't just assume that the real property wasn't destroyed by fire or hurricane over the past five decades, or any figurative or metaphorical equivalent for any product or service.
I think the Republican plan, whatever it turns-out to be, and I have pushed hard for freedom of association and freedom of travel and equal rights my entire life, in normalization of US/CUBA relations and free markets -- not using people as PawnsOfWar because of generation-spanning Legislative pissin' matches -- so, whatever the Republican plan turns-out to be, I ask for fairness, both to Cuban Labor, business sector, family and tourism. A gov't sponsored co-nation financial product must be hashed-out. Don't make careers out of it, and cap fees from the get-go. Please.
Thank you, and kind regards, always,
CLAYTON LEON WINTON
Thu Shevat 2, 5775 06:39PST
---------------------------------------------------
Followups: Thu Shevat 9, 5775, 09:36PDT
Jobless claims at near 15-yr LOW but ONE IN FIVE KIDS ON FOOD STAMPS, two headlines in the news this morning. There is nothing "healthy" about such an economy.
Firstly, if true, "fifteen-yr low for jobless claims," that implies labor is less productive than ever, wages lower than ever, inflation greater than ever, because kids aren't being properly fed.
I suspect something else: the "job-stats" are extrapolated from ever "finessed" data-sets to produce POLITICAL RESULTS, not factual economic results.
That's the typical Higher Education's Predatory Credentialing System "positive thinking" brainwashing: SAY ANYTHING AND ACCUSE ALL WHOM QUESTION OF BEING 'NEGATIVE," then laugh, and walk away, ignoring reality as usual.
Meanwhile, the same amount of CASH that tax-dodging APPLE INC is storing OFF-SHORE, $178Billion, would erase Greece's debt, save the EU and defend a strategic and economic ally for the U.S, the EU itself.
Meanwhile, all the APPLE INC jobs are MADE in CHINA where workers earn, after "technical training," a couple/few-hundred dollars a month. The cost of the iPhone to make is probably under fifty dollars a unit, yet sells in the U.S. and EU for $600-800 each.
Meanwhile, the costs to government and society of the APPLE INC "success" is ever-growing:
1) deforestation and strip-mining, and the consumption of natural resources, mostly fossil fuels to smelt the oars to make iPhones, the 'dirty-energy' consumption to run the factories (mostly coal-fired electrical energy plants), producing the greatest Carbon Footprint of any manufacturing process in history, greenhouse gases and other toxins leaching into air, soils and drinking-water there and worldwide from disposal and discarded units, etc., yet China takes the blame according to the Obama Admin who is proposing import/export taxation and various tariffs, against China and Chinese companies that are NOT involved in that.
2) Governments "over-stressed" -- there is the fact that distracted-drivers, texting-while-driving (or talking), is over-stressing Emergency Services in multiple countries; there is all the property damage associated with that, police reports, maintenance crews, disposal, hospital services, ambulance services, law enforcement issues ... and all the wildlife, livestock, pets and pedestrians injured and/or killed.
3) social ails : there's more to it than just "distractions" -- there is the sociopathy factor; there is the hacking issues, and a good case could be made that APPLE INC technologies have been employed in every hacking incident worldwide, credit card fraud, bank fraud, data vandalism, cyber vandalism, privacy intrusions and privacy invasions, illegal surveillance by perverts, all of it. Meanwhile, I walked into a bar, and everybody in it, picked-up their iPhones and faked being "super-duper important and busy" ... not a single person was talking, having a conversation, or even said "hello," which is increasingly what will be remembered as the molestation of the Legacy of JOBS.
Thursday, January 08, 2015
Defending CENEX
Re: 01072015 news broadcast, CENEX "$30 Rent" Cardboard Box"
I was surprised by the 'angle' of the reporting and the 'leading comments' asked of a 'former-homeless' person.
Political satire and free expression is how I interpret the sign on the cardboard box (Charlie Hebdo style) -- for Homelessness is the "only option" for the needy, the poor, single parents, and those who experience discrimination the most, such as GayLandIs (world's LGBTQ peoples). Therefore, reminders, such as political-satire, are vital today.
Please freely-express the right to free-expression, political/socio-economic satire is under attack from many subtle (and not so-subtle, re: Charlie Hebdo) 'angles.' Everybody has an excuse to be 'offended' (catchphrase for "hate" somebody else and deny equality, free-speech).
The CENEX Franchise owner and employees should not be ridiculed nor scorned, but celebrated for their efforts at Public Awareness regarding these topics.
Thank you, and kind regards, always,
CLAYTON LEON WINTON citizen#C03183395
I was surprised by the 'angle' of the reporting and the 'leading comments' asked of a 'former-homeless' person.
Political satire and free expression is how I interpret the sign on the cardboard box (Charlie Hebdo style) -- for Homelessness is the "only option" for the needy, the poor, single parents, and those who experience discrimination the most, such as GayLandIs (world's LGBTQ peoples). Therefore, reminders, such as political-satire, are vital today.
Please freely-express the right to free-expression, political/socio-economic satire is under attack from many subtle (and not so-subtle, re: Charlie Hebdo) 'angles.' Everybody has an excuse to be 'offended' (catchphrase for "hate" somebody else and deny equality, free-speech).
The CENEX Franchise owner and employees should not be ridiculed nor scorned, but celebrated for their efforts at Public Awareness regarding these topics.
Thank you, and kind regards, always,
CLAYTON LEON WINTON citizen#C03183395